Difference between revisions of "Modal Shortcuts"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Modal Shortcuts (view source)

Revision as of 08:35, 20 July 2020

42,244 bytes removed ,  08:35, 20 July 2020
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Modal test and analysis is used to determine the engineering structures<nowiki>’</nowiki> modal parameters, such as modal frequencies, damping ratios, and mode shapes. The measured excitation and response (or only response) data are utilized in modal analysis, and then dynamic signal analysis and modal parameters identification are processed. The modal test and analysis has been developed for more than three decades, and much progresses have been made. It has been widely applied to the engineering filed, such as the dynamic design, manufacture and maintenance, vibration and noise reduction, vibration control, condition monitoring, fault detection, model updating and model validation.
===Operating Deflection Shape===
Operating Deflection Shape (ODS) is the simplest way to see how a machine or structure moves during its operation, at a specific frequency or moment in time. There are two types of ODS: time domain ODS (TD ODS) and frequency domain ODS (FD ODS).
TD ODS is based on the multi-channel time history data acquired spatially from a machine or structure.  It shows the vibration motion of the machine or structure in a period of time clearly, just like a recorder. You can view a structure<nowiki>’</nowiki>s overall motion, and the motion of one part relative to another. Locations of excessive vibration are easily identified.<br><br>FD ODS is based on the frequency response functions (FRFs) or power spectral density functions (PSDs), which can be estimated from multi-channel time history data acquired spatially from a machine or structure. It shows how a structure behaves at a single frequency, helping you to find whether or not a resonance is being excited. In the OROS Modal, you even be allowed to inside the different behaves of repeated frequencies.
===Experimental Modal Analysis===
In the Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA), the structures are excited by artificial forces, then both the inputs (excitation) and outputs (response) are measured to get the frequency response functions (FRFs) or impulse response functions (IRFs) by digital signal processing. Modal parameters can be identified from FRFs or IRFs by identification algorithms in frequency domain or time domain. EMA tests are usually carried out in the lab, with the advantage of high SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) and easy to change test status.
EMA identification methods can be classified into time domain (TD) methods and frequency domain (FD) methods according to different identification domain. Also they can be classified into SISO (single input single output), SIMO (single input multiple output), and MIMO (multiple input multiple output) according to different number of input and output.
The FRFs are generally utilized for the EMA in frequency domain, which are estimated from the excitation and response signals. Then the modal parameters are identified by constructing the parametric or nonparametric models of the FRFs and and curve fitting them. While the IRFs are generally utilized for the EMA in time domain, which can be obtained the inverse FFT of FRFs.
Time domain methods are suitable for the global analysis in a broad frequency band, which have good numeric stability. However, there are some limitations too: (1) very difficult to confirm the order of math model, (2) always time consuming, (3) many calculation modes got with the structural modes, and difficult to delete them, (4) many setting and judgment needed, complicated-to-use, (5) not able to taking account of the influence of out-band modes. Contrarily, frequency domain methods are always reliable, rapid, easy-to-use, with the capacity to consider the out-band modes and analysis uneven spaced FRFs, so they are applied widely.
===Operational Modal Analysis===
Operational Modal Analysis is used for large civil engineering structures, operating machinery or other structures, making use of their output response only. These structures are always loaded by natural loads that cannot easily be controlled and measured, for instance waves loads (offshore structures), wind loads (Buildings) or traffic loads (bridges).
Compared with EMA, OMA has its outstanding advantages. In OMA the structure studied is excited by natural loads instead of some expensive excitation equipments as used in EMA. In fact it is very difficult to excite large structures by artificial means. So OMA is more economic and fast, and endowed by nature with characteristics of multiple-input / multiple-output (MIMO). It could be used to distinguish closely coupled modes. Moreover, all the measured responses come under operational state of structures, and their real dynamic characteristics in operation could be revealed, so OMA is very suitable for health monitoring and damage detection of large-scale structures.
Because there are limited channels and accelerometers in a data acquisition system, you may need to decide how to distribute the many measurement points in several groups, the so-called setups. For each setup you should keep 1 or more accelerators at the same location, which are called reference points. The reference points should be located far away the nodal points of the mode shapes. It is recommended to set 2 or 3 reference points.
===Modal software features===
* Running on the current mainstream Operating systems: Windows 2000/XP/2003 Server/Vista
* Coding with VC<nowiki>++</nowiki> language and object oriented programming technique, easy to be maintained and expanded
* Four powerful functions: geometry modeling, project management, dynamic signal processing, and modal analysis
* Convenient data importing interface, not only for time domain signal, but also frequency domain signal
* Direct data acquisition from OR3x series analyzers, performing a modal test easily and rapidly
* Various data format: Modal standard file format, Universal File Format (UFF) and OROS format (res, oxf, or oxl)
* Integrated functions for geometry modeling
** Import geometry from UFF or IGES files
** Export geometry to UFF files
** Create regular 3D geometry objects
** Create and edit geometry interactively
** Undo and redo operations for geometry edit
** Customized geometry library
* Combined with all kinds of data acquisition systems or dynamic signal analyzers to make up advanced modal analysis systems
* Powerful, effective and easy-to-use signal processing based on wizard setting
** Detrend, decimation and digital filter
** Customized FFT parameters: FFT length, average times, and overlap percent
** All kinds of window function: boxcar, hanning, hamming, flattop, exponential, force and so on
** Power Spectrum Density (PSD) estimation: Auto PSD, Cross PSD, PSD matrix, using Welch<nowiki>’</nowiki>s averaged periodogram technique
** Single input / multiple output (SIMO) FRF estimation: H1, H2 and Hc methods
** Multiple input / multiple output (MIMO) FRF estimation with multiple coherence function
** The signal processing is reversible
* Dealing with not only traditional Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA), but also Operational Modal Analysis (OMA)
* EMA techniques based on both input (excitation force) and output response
** Select-band SIMO modal analysis technique: SIMO rational fraction orthogonal polynomial (RFOP), to obtain several modes from a selected frequency band by one identification
** Narrow-band MIMO modal analysis technique, MIMO complex mode indicator function (CMIF), to identify modes one by one
** Select-band MIMO modal analysis technique: frequency domain poly-reference (FDPR) and MIMO rational fraction orthogonal polynomial (RFPM), to obtain several modes from a selected frequency band by one identification
** Broad-band MIMO modal analysis technique: EMA broad band frequency domain (EBFD) , to obtain many modes from a broad frequency band by one identification, or even obtain all the modes from the full frequency band by one identification
** MIMO analysis methods: with capacity to identify heavy close or even repeated modes, ideal methods for experimental modal analysis of large and complicated structures
** Single reference (SR) and Multiple References (MR) hammer impact modal analysis techniques
* OMA techniques base on output data only
** Valuable for the large civil engineering structures, operating machinery or other structures which are not easily excited artificially; cheap and fast, without requirement for excitation equipment; able to get the dynamic characters of structures in real operating conditions
** Narrow-band operational modal analysis technique: frequency spatial domain decomposition (FSDD), to obtain modes one by one from the full output spectrum matrix
** Narrow-band operational modal analysis technique: complex mode indicator function (CMIF), sharing the same algorithm with EMA Narrow-band, to obtain modes one by one from the half output spectrum matrix
** Broad-band operational modal analysis technique: OMA broad band frequency domain (OBFD), to obtain many modes from a broad frequency band of the half output spectrum matrix by one identification, or even obtain all the modes from the full frequency band by one identification
* Adopting mode indicator function (MIF) to indicate the existence of structural modes
* Unlimited number of identified modes
* Flexible interface arrangement and various mouse and hotkey operation, thereby greatly improving work efficiency
* Perfect and friendly function for arranging interface, operating and exporting data
** Multiple language interface: English and Chinese are available, and it<nowiki>’</nowiki>s convenient to develop other language interface
** Special 2D and 3D graphic control panes, supplemented with other control modes such as mouse, hotkey, and menu operations
** Flexible 2D curves display and control: showing or hiding gridlines, legends and other components, providing complete measurement information (measurement node, direction, whether driving point or not, and so ) of each plot
** Multiple curve expressions: magnitude (linear, log, and dB coordinate), phase, unwrapped phase, real part, imaginary part, and Nyquist
** Flexible 3D graphics display and control: showing or hiding node ID, input / output tags, axis and other components, freely translating, zooming and rotating the object
** Top, bottom, left, right, front and back view of 3D objects, rendering in the style of frame lines or surface
** Animation control based on OpenGL: play, stop, previous/next frame, amplitude and speed control functions
** Exporting the modal results to text or graph
** Directly saving all the curves or graphics to BMP or JPG files
** Exporting the mode animation to AVI media files, convenient to generate multimedia presentation
==ODS & Modal Analysis==
Modal can deal with Operating Deflection Shape (ODS) Analysis and two types of modal analysis:  Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA, both input and output data are available) and Operational Modal Analysis (OMA, only output data are available).
You can find out how a machine or structure moves during its operation via ODS, which shows the overall dynamic characters of the structure or machine.
You can get the modal parameters of structures via EMA or OMA, by performing the following four steps: (1)Signal processing to get frequency response functions (for EMA) or output power spectrum matrices (for OMA); (2) Selecting an appropriate identification algorithm;（3）Doing modal identification; (4) Operating the identification results, such as viewing mode shapes, copying, and removing, and so on.
Almost all the algorithms begin with the Modal Indicator Function (MIF).
The following modules are available in Modal:  TD ODS,  FD ODS,  EMA Narband (CMIF),  EMA SelBand-SIMO (RFOP), EMA SelBand-MIMO 1 (FDPR),  EMA SelBand MIMO 2 (RFPM), EMA BroBand (BBFD),  OMA NarBand Full (FSDD),  OMA NarBand Half (CMIF), and  OMA BroBand (OBFD). A NarBand method means an algorithm performed in a narrow frequency band, who has the biggest advantage of simple and easy to use. You can identify the modes only by picking the peaks of MIF one by one. A SelBand method means an algorithm performed in one or several selected frequency bands. A BroBand method means an algorithm performed in a broad frequency band or even the full frequency band sometimes.
An effective tool  Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) is also provided to validate the result of modal identification.
===Modal Analaysis process illustration===
====Selecting an Algorithm====
Before modal identification, you should select an appropriate algorithm according to the analysis type (EMA or OMA) and number of input (SIMO or MIMO). You can select the specified algorithm by mouse click on the corresponding item in the "Workspace" shortcut pane. A message will appear if you success in doing this.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_118.png|framed|none]]
Another appropriate algorithm can be selected for necessary. And you can compare the results from different algorithms. If some selected algorithm is not fit for the current case, you will be prompted to select another one.
====Doing Modal Identification====
It<nowiki>’</nowiki>s recommended to employ the modal indicator function (MIF) for the modal identification in the frequency domain. The identification process varies according to different type of algorithms.
# Narrow-Band Identification Algorithm
(1) Open the MIF curves interface by pressing the [[Image:Modal_Manual_119.png]]button in the toolbar, and the following interface will appear:
[[Image:Modal_Manual_120.png|framed|none]]
The interface consists of two mode list views and a tab window view (<nowiki>’</nowiki>MIF<nowiki>’</nowiki> tab and <nowiki>’</nowiki>Enhanced<nowiki>’</nowiki> tab ). The two mode list view is synchronous. You can adjust the separator lines to resize these views.
(2) Press the[[Image:Modal_Manual_121.png]]button in the toolbar to begin the NarBand modal identification.
(3) Check the identified results and curve fitting of enhanced curves. All the identified modes will be shown in the two mode list views and output shortcut pane. You can check the relevant enhanced curves and its curve fitting in each setup for each mode. If ideal curve fitting hasn<nowiki>’</nowiki>t been got, you can adjust the fitting band manually, and identify this mode again in the current setup by double clicks.
# Select-Band Identification Algorithm
(1) Open the MIF curves interface by pressing the [[Image:Modal_Manual_122.png]] button in the toolbar.
(2) Select the identification frequency band. Move the cursors by mouse or keyboard to the frequency point you want, then double click the mouse or press Enter key to select this band. As a result, a tag like "<nowiki>[</nowiki>-<nowiki>]</nowiki>" appears to indicate this selected band. The data in this band will be used for modal identification. Multiple selected bands for the identification are allowed in Modal, and all the data in these bands will be used to identify modal parameters. To delete the latest selected band, you can use the [[Image:Modal_Manual_123.png]] button in the toolbar, or by the mouse<nowiki>’</nowiki>s middle click. To delete all the selected bands, you can use the [[Image:Modal_Manual_124.png]] button in the toolbar, or by the mouse<nowiki>’</nowiki>s middle double clicks.
(3) Specify the modal order in the selected bands. MIF plot can be used to indicate the modes existence efficiently. A peak in this plot means a mode. For example, in the selected band of the following figure, four modes are detected, including two heavily closed modes.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_125.png|framed|none]]
(4) Press the [[Image:Modal_Manual_126.png]] button in the toolbar to begin modal identification with selected algorithm.
(5) Check the results. The synthesized FRF/HPSD curves will appear in the main window after identification, and the result will be shown in the output shortcut pane. At the same time, an item corresponding to the selected identification algorithm will appear under the directory of <nowiki>’</nowiki>Data\Setup1\Mode<nowiki>’</nowiki> in the workspace shortcut pane.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_127.png|framed|none]]
Double click on this item will show the identified mode list.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_128.png|framed|none]]
3. Broad-Band Identification Algorithm
The process of Broad-Band algorithms is almost the same with Select-Band algorithms, only that broader or even full frequency band can be set for the Broad-Band identification.
====Operating the Results====
Detailed information on identified modal frequencies, damping ratios, identification time, if structural mode are displayed in the mode list view. You can sort the modes ascending or descending according to the specified keyword by clicking on this column header. Also you can do many other operations by the toolbar or right click popup menu, such as deleting modes, copying modes, viewing the mode shapes, exporting the modes, and so on.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_129.png|framed|none]]
You can also double click on the icon of <nowiki>’</nowiki><nowiki>’</nowiki> in the front of each row to view the mode shape animations. The mode shape animations are an import criterion of modal identification.
===Modal Indicator Function (MIF)===
A very important step of modal identification is to determine how many modes are contained in a selected frequency band. MIF plot is a very good tool to achieve this, indicating the modes efficiently.
MIF can be employed in not only EMA, but also OMA. The number of MIFs equals the number of excitations or references. The MIFs consist of the singular values of frequency response function matrix (FRF), output power spectral density matrix (OPSD), or half power spectral density matrix (HPSD).
By the powerful singular value decomposition, the real signal space is separated from the noise space. Therefore, the MIFs exhibit the modes effectively. A peak in the MIFs plot usually indicate the existence of a structural mode, and two peaks at a same frequency point means the existence of two repeated modes. Moreover, the magnitude of the MIFs always implies the strength of a mode.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_130.png|framed|none]]
Sometimes we should note the cross modes, for example
[[Image:Modal_Manual_131.png|framed|none]]
As showed in the above figure, the peak in the second MIF curve doesn<nowiki>’</nowiki>t indicate a mode. It<nowiki>’</nowiki>s formed by the cross of two modes.
===Operating Deflection Shape===
====Time domain ODS====
With Modal, you can animate time domain ODS directly from multi-channel data that was acquired spatially from a machine or structure. This is done by sweeping a cursor through a set of time histories. You can stop the animation, back it up, and play it forward to observe in slow motion vibration phenomena that may have taken place very quickly.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_132.png|framed|none]]
====Frequency Domain ODS====
With Modal, you can animate frequency domain ODS directly from data that was acquired spatially from a machine or structure. This is done by sweeping a cursor through a set of frequency domain measurements, or dwelling at a specific frequency. A FD ODS allows you to see how a structure behaves at a single frequency.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_133.png|framed|none]]
===Modal Analysis===
====Modal identification methods====
Modal analysis can be conducted via artificial excitation, e.g. shaker or instrument hammer excitation, and input force and output responses are measured. That is normally called an Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA). Modal analysis can be also accomplished during operational conditions of a mechanical structure via responses measurements due to ambient or natural excitation, or other excitation but without input force measurements. This is called as Operational Modal Analysis (OMA).<br>Modal identification algorithms can generally be divided into 2 categories: Time domain (TD) techniques and frequency domain (FD) techniques. TD modal identification has the advantage of estimation of all the modes in the frequency band of interests at once. However, all the TD modal identification algorithms have common unfavorable feature, difficulty to distinguish physical (structural) modes from computational (noise) modes. For application to real-world structure, to locate structural modes reliably is the most important task of a modal analysis. This is why only FD techniques are implemented in OM2.
{|border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" width="100%"
|align = "center"|<font color="#365F91">'''EMA'''</font>
|align = "center"|<font color="#365F91">'''OMA'''</font>
|-
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|<br>EMA approach can be divided into three levels based on Single Input Single Output (SISO), Single Input Multiple Outputs (SIMO), Multiple Input Multiple Outputs (MIMO).<br>Modal is born in MIMO. However, SIMO algorithm is also implemented for preliminary application.<br>MIMO EMA has important advantages: not only consistent results can be obtained, but close spaced and even repeated modes can be identified.<br>A modal Indication function (MIF) is calculated via Singular-Value-Decomposition (SVD) of the frequency Response Functions.
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|<br>OMA is a powerful tool to extract dynamic characteristics of real world structure from output-only measurements during operational conditions. The output response can be generated by ambient or natural excitation as well as artificial broadband excitation (but without input force measurements).<br>A modal Indication function (MIF) is calculated via Singular-Value-Decomposition of Power Spectrum Density (PSD) matrix or Half Power Spectrum Density (HPSD) matrix.
|-
|&nbsp;
|align = "center"|<font color="#365F91">'''OMA Narband Full'''</font>
|-
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|&nbsp;
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|Narrow-band operational modal identification algorithm in frequency domain.
# Distinguishes structural modes from noise modes much easier compare to TD OMA.
# Based on modal decomposition of Power Spectrum Density (PSD) matrix.
# Identifies one mode at a time.
# Can easily deal with closely spaced or even repeated modes of real word mechanical structures.
# Easy-to-use.
# An assumption that singular vector, i.e. mode shapes vector, are orthogonal is made. However, even with this approximation, the modal parameters identified still have enough accuracy to meet engineering need.<br>
|-
|align = "center"|<font color="#365F91">'''EMA Narband'''</font>
|align = "center"|<font color="#365F91">'''OMA Narband Half'''</font>
|-
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|Narrow-band MIMO modal identification algorithm.
# Identifies one mode at a time.
# Can easily deal with closely spaced or even repeated modes of real word mechanical structures.
# Easy to use.
# As typical spatial domain decomposition technique enough output measurements are required.
# An assumption that singular vector, i.e. mode shapes vector, are orthogonal is made. However, even with this approximation, the modal parameters identified still have enough accuracy to meet engineering need.<br>
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|Narrow-band MIMO modal identification algorithm.
# Based on modal decomposition of Half Power Spectrum Density (HPSD) matrix.
# Identifies one mode at a time.
# Can easily deal with closely spaced or even repeated modes of real word mechanical structures.
# Easy to use.
# As typical spatial domain decomposition technique enough output measurements are required.
# An assumption that singular vector, i.e. mode shapes vector, are orthogonal is made. However, even with this approximation, the modal parameters identified still have enough accuracy to meet engineering need<font color="#365F91">.<br>
|-
|align = "center"|'''EMA Selband SIMO'''
|&nbsp;
|-
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|Selected-band SIMO modal identification technique, suitable for the modal test with only one excitation or one reference, e.g., a single shaker or single reference for impact tests.
# Identifies a few modes at a time at user-selected frequency bandwidth.
# Based on Rational Fraction Polynomial formulation of frequency response function (FRF). To improve numerical performance, orthogonal polynomial is adopted instead of power polynomial in traditional FRF representation.
# Can be applied in modal testing with a few response measurements.<br>
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|&nbsp;
|-
|align = "center"|'''EMA Selband MIMO1'''
|&nbsp;
|-
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|Selected-band MIMO modal identification technique.
# Identifies a few modes at a time at user-selected frequency bandwidth.
# Can easily deal with closely spaced or even repeated modes of real-world complex mechanical structures.
# A rank chart is displayed to be sure of the number of modes within the frequency band.
# All modal parameters within the frequency band will be automatically identified.
# FRF curve-fitting, i.e. comparison between synthesized FRFs based on identified modal parameters and measured FRFs is applied for validation.
# Use Singular-Value Decomposition (SVD) of FRF data for distinguish structural modes from noise modes, and Principle Component Analysis (PCA) for data condensation.
# Easy to use.
# Normally the number of measurements should be larger than the number of modes.<br>
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|&nbsp;
|-
|align = "center"|'''EMA Selband MIMO2'''
|&nbsp;
|-
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|Selected-band MIMO modal identification technique.
# Identifies a few modes at a time at user-selected frequency bandwidth.
# Can easily deal with closely spaced or even repeated modes of real-world mechanical structures.
# Based on Rational Fraction Polynomial formulation of frequency response function (FRF). To improve numerical performance, orthogonal polynomial is adopted instead of power polynomial in traditional FRF representation.
# It would be better to limit the number of references DOFs of the FRF matrix, e.g. less than three.
# Can be applied in modal testing with a few response measurements.<br><br>
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|&nbsp;
|-
|align = "center"|'''EMA Broadband'''
|align = "center"|'''OMA Broadband'''
|-
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|Broad-band MIMO modal identification technique.
# Identifies all modes in a broad frequency band or even in the full frequency band.
# Can easily deal with closely spaced or even repeated modes of real-world mechanical structures.
# Can deal with heavily damped modes.
# Can produce clear frequency stabilization chart.
# Selects the structural poles automatically.
# It is recommended to identify the rigid body modes along.
# Can be applied in modal testing with a few response measurements.<br>
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|Broad-band operational modal identification technique.
# Based on the Half PSD estimated from output responses.
# Identifies all modes in a broad frequency band or even in the full frequency band.
# Can easily deal with closely spaced or even repeated modes of real-world mechanical structures.
# Can deal with heavily damped modes.
# Can produce clear frequency stabilization chart.
# Selects the structural poles automatically.
# It is recommended to identify the rigid body modes along.<br>
|}
====Narband (CMIF)====
Complex Mode Indicator Function (CMIF), is an narrow band modal identification algorithm in the frequency domain. CMIF an easy-to-use method. You should use it as the following steps:
=====Selecting a Peak=====
Press the button [[Image:Modal_Manual_134.png]] in the toolbar, and click the MIF plot to activate it. A red cross marker <nowiki>’</nowiki>十<nowiki>’</nowiki> will appear, who is able to find the local peak automatically. The index and coordinate value of the marker are shown in the top left corner of MIF graph. In the figure below, (99,1):<nowiki>[</nowiki>47.85,3.48e<nowiki>+</nowiki>001<nowiki>]</nowiki> means that the cross cursor is now at the 99th point of the first MIF curve, and the coordinate is (47.85, 34.8).
　
=====Auto Identification=====
After selecting the peak, you should double click to finish this identification. The identified results will be shown in the MIF plot, mode list and output shortcut pane. Each identified mode will be marker with a shape symbol. Its middle pane indicates the position of peak, and the line points to the identified frequency. The mode selected in the mode list will be marked yellow in the MIF plot while the others are blue.
=====Checking curve fitting and Refitting=====
You can check the quality of curve fitting by selecting some mode in the mode list and then turning to the <nowiki>’</nowiki>Enhanced<nowiki>’</nowiki> tab page. Seen from below, the blue one is the enhanced FRF curve, and the red one is its fitting curve. Sometimes the identification result is not good because of the automatically selected band is not the best. Thus you can move the two cursors to select a better band, then '''double click''' to identify this mode again.
====Selband SIMO (RFOP)====
[[Image:Modal_Manual_04.png|framed|none]]
[[Image:Modal_Manual_135.png|framed|none]]
Rational Fraction Orthogonal Polynomials (RFOP), is an SIMO modal identification algorithm in the frequency domain. It is suitable for cases with only one excitation or one reference. RFOP can fit the FRFs or HPSDs in a fairy broad frequency band.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_136.png|framed|none]]
Each parameter is defined as the following：
=====Input Number=====
Number of excitations or references. It is automatically displayed by the software, and can only be 1 in the RFOP algorithm.
=====Output Number=====
Number of excitations or non-references.  It is automatically displayed by the software.
=====Denominator Order=====
Rational fraction math model is used in the RFOP algorithm, and the order of denominator is twice of the modal order in the selected frequency band. Generally you can confirm the modal order by the MIF plot. In some cases, the modal order should be increased properly to hold the noisy modes, and the noise modes can be deleted by the criterion on damping ratios and mode shapes.
=====Modal Order=====
This parameter varies with the denominator order you set. You should ensure that this value equal or larger than the real modal order in the selected frequency band.
=====Numerator Order=====
This parameter varies with the denominator order you set, and keeping equal to it. You are allowed to set this value individually to be larger than the denominator order, for the sake of compensating for the out-band modes.
====Selband MIMO1====
Frequency Domain Poly-reference (FDPR), is a MIMO modal identification algorithm in the frequency domain. It is suitable for cases with multiple excitations or multiple references. FDPR usually fits the FRFs or HPSDs in a narrow frequency band. The outstanding advantage of FDPR is its highly easy-to-use.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_137.png|framed|none]]
Besides the MIF plot, two another bar graphs are provided for you to confirm the modal order in the selected frequency band according to the bars<nowiki>’</nowiki> height. The upper graph shows the relative height of each mode, and it indicates the first four modes are greater than others. The lower graph shows the ratio of previous mode vs. next mode. You will find the fourth one is extremely high. It means that there are 4 structural modes, and the rest are <nowiki>’</nowiki>noisy modes". So, here you should specify the system order to 4.
Each parameter is defined as the following：
=====Number of Bars=====
Number of bars shown in the graph, default as 10. The minimum value of this parameter is 2, and the maximum value is the output number of FRFs. You can change this value to view the bas more clearly.
=====Order of System=====
Modal order in the selected frequency band. Generally a fairy good value will be automatically set according to the practice. You are also allowed to change this value to get better result.
====EMA Selband MIMO2====
Rational Fraction Orthogonal Polynomials for MIMO (RFPM), is a MIMO modal identification algorithm in the frequency domain. It is suitable for cases with multiple excitations or multiple references. RFPM can fit the FRFs or HPSDs in a fairy broad frequency band.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_138.png|framed|none]]
Each parameter is defined as the following：
=====Input Number=====
Number of excitations or references. It is automatically displayed by the software.
=====Output Number=====
Number of excitations or non-references. It is automatically displayed by the software.
=====Denominator Order=====
Matrix form fractional fraction math model is used in the RFPM algorithm, and the order of denominator is related with the modal order in the selected frequency band. Generally you can confirm the modal order by the MIF plot. The product of denominator order and input number should be larger than twice of the modal order. When the product of denominator order and input number is larger than the twice of the modal order, noisy modes will be identified, which can be deleted by the criterion on damping ratios and mode shapes.
=====Modal Order=====
This parameter varies with the denominator order you set. You should ensure that this value equal or larger than the real modal order in the selected frequency band.
=====Numerator Order=====
This parameter varies with the denominator order you set, and keeping equal to it. You are allowed to set this value individually to be larger than the denominator order, for the sake of compensating for the out-band modes.
====EMA Broadband (BBFD)====
The BroBand modal identification module is based on the algorithm of Polyreference Least Squares Complex Frequency (p-LSCF), developed in 2003. p-LSCF is a frequency MIMO modal identification algorithm which has superior performance compared to most time domain MIMO techniques, such as Polyreference Least Squares Complex Exponential (PRCE or LSCE), Extended Ibrahim Time Domain (EITD), and Eigensystem Realization Algorithm(ERA). BroBand EMA makes use of measured Frequency Response Function (FRF) as source data.
　
=====Features/Advantages of EMA Broband=====
EMA BroBand does not suffer from numerical problems, i.e. ill-conditioning problem in computing poles of the system in broadband as most frequency domain modal identification algorithm, e.g. Rational Fraction Orthogonal Polynomial (RFOP) and Frequency Domain Polyreference (FDPR), encountered. Compared to SelBand techniques, BroBand can then be applied to identify all the modes in a wide, including full, frequency band of interest at one time.
Compared to most time domain modal identification techniques, such as well know Polyreference (or Least Squares) Complex Exponential (PRCE, or LSCE) technique, :BroBand yields extremely clear stability diagram, making it much easier to select structural modes, or the physical poles, from which modal frequencies and damping ratios can be readily obtained.
The BroBand modular in OM2 has the feature of automatic modal sorting capability, i.e. BroBand can automatically distinguish structural modes from "noise" modes, or real modes from spurious modes.
=====Main Procedures for EMA BroBand=====
Major procedures for modal identification with EMA Broband are as follows:
# Select a frequency band
The EMA Broband can be used to identify all modes in a broad frequency band, including full band. However, frequency band selection may be advantageous and is suggested in the cases as:
* In the "soft" suspension of test article to simulate free-free boundary condition, so called "rigid-body modes" are sometime weakly excited in low frequency range. In this case, frequency band selection excluding this low frequency range is suggested for identification of flexible structural modes. The "rigid-body modes" can also be obtained with selection of corresponding low frequency band.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_139.png|framed|none]]
* A structure under testing sometimes shows "strong mode" or "global modes" in specific frequency band, and "weak modes", or "local modes" in other frequency band. These "strong/global modes" and "weak/local modes" can be easily observed from Modal Indication Function (MIF) plot based on height of the MIF peaks. In this case, it is suggested to divide the full band into few sub-band which cover "strong/global modes" and "weak/local modes", respectively.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_140.png|framed|none]]
* It is suggested to start the frequency band from a valley of the MIF plots, and end the band at a valley too. According to our experience, such a frequency band can yield better result.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_141.png|framed|none]]
# Start Identification
Press the button of "Start Identification" [[Image:Modal_Manual_142.png]]in the toolbar to start modal identification.
# Modal Order determination
Preliminary determination of the number of modes in the selected frequency band according to the MIF plot, and fill it in the edit box of "Preset Modes No." Then the BroBand software will calculate a default "minimum order" according to this number. The relationship between "Preset Modes No." and "Minimum Order" is: minimum order = (preset modes No)*Ni/2, where Ni means the number of input.
Change the number of "Order Span" if necessary. The BroBand software will estimate the poles with a range of system order from "Minimum Order" to "Maximum Order", where Maximum order= Minimum order <nowiki>+</nowiki> Order Span-1. The default order span is 12.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_143.png|framed|none]]
"Start Modal ID"
Press the button of "Start Modal ID" or [[Image:Modal_Manual_144.png]] to obtain frequency stability diagram. This operation might take a little longer time to finish a complex structure with large number of modes and measurement coordinates. In the stability diagram, a shape symbol represents one pole. A pole in this diagram may represent a physical (i.e. structural) mode or a spurious (or noise) mode. It is normally not difficult to distinguish physical/structural) mode from spurious/noise mode by the distribution of poles. Generally speaking, a physical/structural mode can be identified in each proper number of orders, while for a spurious/noise pole it usually is not the case. There are five kinds of symbols to indicate the poles:
{|border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" width="91%" align="center"
|'''Symbol'''
|'''Description'''
|-
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|'''o'''
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|The pole is not stable. (The poles obtained from the first order are always considered as unstable.)
|-
|'''f'''
|The frequency of the pole does not change within the tolerance of 1%.
|-
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|'''v'''
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|The frequency of the pole does not change within the tolerance of 1%, <br>and the pole vector does not change within the tolerance of 10%.
|-
|'''d'''
|The frequency of the pole does not change within the tolerance of 1%, <br>and the damping of the pole does not change within the tolerance of 10%.
|-
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|'''s'''
|bgcolor = "#D3DFEE"|Both frequency, damping and vector are stable within the tolerances:<br>the frequency of the pole does not change within the tolerance of 1%;<br>the pole vector does not change within the tolerance of 10%;<br>and the damping of the pole does not change within the tolerance of 10%.
|}<br clear="all">
[[Image:Modal_Manual_145.png|framed|none]]
# "Auto Selection" of structural modes
Press the button of "Auto Selection" or  [[Image:Modal_Manual_146.png]], the OM2 selects the physical/structural modes automatically. While move the mouse cursor on a pole, the modal frequency and damping ratio corresponding to this pole will be shown. You can move the mouse on different poles to check the stability via small change of the modal frequency and/or damping ratio.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_147.png|framed|none]]
You can zoom in to check part of the stabilization diagram by click and drag a rectangle with the mouse.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_148.png|framed|none]]
[[Image:Modal_Manual_149.png|framed|none]]
# Manually selection of physical/structural poles
A pole can also be manually selected by clicking it or deselected it by same operation. A selected pole will be marked with a shape symbol [[Image:Modal_Manual_150.png]].
[[Image:Modal_Manual_151.png|framed|none]]
#  Mode shape calculation
Press the button of "Calc. Modeshape" to confirm the pole section and BroBand software start to estimate the mode shapes and to calculate the synthesized FRFs.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_152.png|framed|none]]
# Inspection of identified modal parameters
Open the view of mode list. Yyou can check the identified result here: modal frequencies, damping ratios, modal A, modal B, and mode shape animations.
[[Image:Modal_Manual_153.png|framed|none]]
# Continue modal identification in another frequency band
If more than one frequency band is selected, returning to the MIF plot window, and repeat the above operations. The result obtained from previous modal identification can also be loaded by pressing the button of "Load Para.".
=====On the Toolbar of "BBFD Setting" Diagram=====
[[Image:Modal_Manual_154.png|framed|none]]
{|border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" width="100%"
|align = "center"|
[[Image:Modal_Manual_155.png|framed|none]]
|Display the full band of current curve
|-
|align = "center"|
[[Image:Modal_Manual_156.png|framed|none]]
|Back to previous display range
|-
|align = "center"|
[[Image:Modal_Manual_157.png|framed|none]]
|Go to next display range
|-
|align = "center"|
[[Image:Modal_Manual_158.png|framed|none]]
|Show or hide the graph grid
|-
|align = "center"|
[[Image:Modal_Manual_159.png|framed|none]]
|Copy contents in current main window to the clipboard
|-
|align = "center"|
[[Image:Modal_Manual_160.png|framed|none]]
|Save current snapshot to BMP or JPG
|-
|
[[Image:Modal_Manual_161.png|framed|none]]
|Start modal identification to gain poles
|-
|align = "center"|
[[Image:Modal_Manual_162.png|framed|none]]
|Select the structural poles automatically
|-
|align = "center"|
[[Image:Modal_Manual_163.png|framed|none]]
|Delete all the selected poles
|-
|align = "center"|
[[Image:Modal_Manual_164.png|framed|none]]
|Load the parameters (poles, selected poles, frequency band) of previous modal identification
|}


====Modal validation, MAC & COMAC====
====Modal validation, MAC & COMAC====
Retrieved from "https://wiki.oros.com/index.php?title=Special:MobileDiff/7104"

Navigation menu