8,877
edits
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:modal.png|900px]] | [[File:modal.png|900px]] | ||
==General | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/ESHPvhJIsCBHijgwBeffvcABU-VZCt6ZON1OMcguK2sGoQ?e=qsLNUI What is modal analysis?.]<br> | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/ETV5oBwxLjFHnsfVSL1hit0Bigt_2FuSJIbVmoHjAMPNug?e=Kb0vHk Common mistakes.] | |||
==Acquisition== | ==Acquisition== | ||
===Generality=== | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EQKjRyGlsShNg14lgX6gUtwBSq9W2VdBEwiDQ4jTvI8trg?e=1bCxCc basic steps to acquire data] | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/ | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EVxxlCgPltJHslo8IlH2Y0wB5T_Z1Mn9mpXMiOhaIRWV8Q?e=h9dWZR Can the test setup have an effect on the measured modal data ? Do the setup boundary conditions and accelerometers have an effect?] | [https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EVxxlCgPltJHslo8IlH2Y0wB5T_Z1Mn9mpXMiOhaIRWV8Q?e=h9dWZR Can the test setup have an effect on the measured modal data ? Do the setup boundary conditions and accelerometers have an effect?] | ||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EfDJXZ2NsXBIpNnOPouoJLIBlqBNBjgTfnKQ4OUMay4R6g?e=igvjzh How many points are enough when running a modal test] | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EV4GFjhvcStErAqtxUDAFcUBU6db28UlUtckHR2l09Ad7A?e=3DHX1C is it better to collect averaged FRF data for a modal test? Or collect time data and process it afterwards?] | [https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EV4GFjhvcStErAqtxUDAFcUBU6db28UlUtckHR2l09Ad7A?e=3DHX1C is it better to collect averaged FRF data for a modal test? Or collect time data and process it afterwards?] | ||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EZfWJLtRuCtDpCkrd09zwEUBz2GXFlFjmWmBjBPJ7O1igw?e=o5c75e We talked about the number of points needed for a modal test before.] | [https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EZfWJLtRuCtDpCkrd09zwEUBz2GXFlFjmWmBjBPJ7O1igw?e=o5c75e We talked about the number of points needed for a modal test before.] | ||
===Sensor and reference=== | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/ERUU4dr0usxHiAn1Ih8FTAcBwQYcRPpNEMnUTsmT7JBCTg?e=Ag9Nit I ran one test with an x-excitation and can see some modes and another test with a y-excitation and see some different modes could I use an oblique angle instead ?]<br> | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/Ee9ZZy7KqVxLjWURcjNtKSYBwxXFR_QjQVKhJofS9c4xKA?e=wdtfHO Do I need to have an accelerometer mounted in the X, Y and Z directions to do a modal test?] | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EVWdcqfwhc9Mshv8R6M5BKYB_I8x96uro6ItAhVah31wGA?e=qqb8So Is there a difference between a roving hammer and roving accelerometer test?] | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/ET7xJmNNuyNGnpoX_E0s9MIB7BfU3wKfDjv3gtZlsjGGZA?e=M0mIrO Someone told me that you must have multiple references to identify pseudo repeated.] | [https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/ET7xJmNNuyNGnpoX_E0s9MIB7BfU3wKfDjv3gtZlsjGGZA?e=M0mIrO Someone told me that you must have multiple references to identify pseudo repeated.] | ||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EV3I4RVyqhtInP82-HGjH2gBff6U72IhA7orXLTNWH5LLg?e=JGOeAo Is there any benefit to using multiple references?I thought only one reference was need.] | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/ESRlQH3hGgpLgqwRbYFMOHQBb-J3fkac76JMhSCwgAF_pg?e=qQRnZL Should I always use a hard tip for impact testing . . .so the input spectrum is flat over all frequencies] | [https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/ESRlQH3hGgpLgqwRbYFMOHQBb-J3fkac76JMhSCwgAF_pg?e=qQRnZL Should I always use a hard tip for impact testing . . .so the input spectrum is flat over all frequencies] | ||
Other | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/ESAbTQrm4yFKi0RMb2BVRTYBexWVHZewsr7hvDLPuEtUSQ?e=AZTle9 double impact question] | |||
==Shacker== | ==Shacker== | ||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EZ0xK6BALQlMgiXqGEh1UNkBJfsAo4aPmTwE7UKcLSppEg?e=NpNUPs Is there any difference between a modal test with a shaker excitation or impact excitation?] | [https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EZ0xK6BALQlMgiXqGEh1UNkBJfsAo4aPmTwE7UKcLSppEg?e=NpNUPs Is there any difference between a modal test with a shaker excitation or impact excitation?] | ||
Line 32: | Line 30: | ||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EWVXgK-KbPBLn3VMLviBuuQB7XgfOpaAPUzLPe0dbMhe9A?e=AVixDw I showed some mode shapes to someone. They asked me if the structural design was ok. What should I tell them ?] | [https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EWVXgK-KbPBLn3VMLviBuuQB7XgfOpaAPUzLPe0dbMhe9A?e=AVixDw I showed some mode shapes to someone. They asked me if the structural design was ok. What should I tell them ?] | ||
==Modal theorical== | ==Modal theorical== | ||
===Windowing=== | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/ESeXYLSIKetIp7v1LyevBO0BI0hStYqFdzah5aO9kzgGIA?e=MTVQsF When impact testing, can the use of the exponential window cause any problems?] | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EUw3GiSkKIdBmFAZLE5vw-IBZ6-2-Yczz7zz4i3cTda2iQ?e=btozQG Which window is most appropriate for the various types of modal tests performed?] | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EZmiM-le4zpDvsyTb1Kfmc0B7AymLe5HB810BiQ2jtsxhQ?e=vJbs0G I heard someone say Pete doesn't do windows. Whets the scoop.] | |||
===Curvfitting=== | ===Curvfitting=== | ||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EeYfWtoUNHhIgpr2i1_wYkcBZPq3GmF0ETi7I8DtsuWKoQ?e=d5nXIx Curvefitting is so confusing to me!] | [https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EeYfWtoUNHhIgpr2i1_wYkcBZPq3GmF0ETi7I8DtsuWKoQ?e=d5nXIx Curvefitting is so confusing to me!] | ||
Line 64: | Line 66: | ||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EX4IEP3GWoRPr1V5RTGD5jcBiHNsJ0rJPWpdPaJ_bH_aaQ?e=LIqzlD Why do some measurements have anti-resonances and others not ?] | [https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EX4IEP3GWoRPr1V5RTGD5jcBiHNsJ0rJPWpdPaJ_bH_aaQ?e=LIqzlD Why do some measurements have anti-resonances and others not ?] |