8,877
edits
Difference between revisions of "Modal Theorical FAQ"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EamEoIefNl5Pg0zVmkDUv_4Bh3TXKPJz991K65nXTbuxdg?e=3KQWga I'am still overwhelmed by all this modal stuffLaplace, Fourier, FRFs, and all that!] | [https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EamEoIefNl5Pg0zVmkDUv_4Bh3TXKPJz991K65nXTbuxdg?e=3KQWga I'am still overwhelmed by all this modal stuffLaplace, Fourier, FRFs, and all that!] | ||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EWVXgK-KbPBLn3VMLviBuuQB7XgfOpaAPUzLPe0dbMhe9A?e=AVixDw I showed some mode shapes to someone. They asked me if the structural design was ok. What should I tell them ?] | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/ETt1D-Wue5BBvDzO5y8GwwgBJGvPz-mNmEBZYT-ifPOK9Q?e=nfQafc Does it make any sense to use the actual operating loadsas the excitation force for a modal testif the force is a random signal ?] | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EUw3GiSkKIdBmFAZLE5vw-IBZ6-2-Yczz7zz4i3cTda2iQ?e=btozQG Which window is most appropriate for the various types of modal tests performed?] | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EQJYwQLkKa9Dp1k-gqlMWlwBJ4wmLrIZyuex9aeee5ftyA?e=cw1KIp Why is calibration and mode shape scaling important?And does it make a difference?] | |||
[https://orossas.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/support/EZfWJLtRuCtDpCkrd09zwEUBz2GXFlFjmWmBjBPJ7O1igw?e=o5c75e We talked about the number of points needed for a modal test before.] | |||
feb05 | |||